Gentamicin

 

Study rationale

 

Gentamicin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic, is commonly used to treat neonatal and infant infections like sepsis, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections. However, gentamicin dosing in this age group is challenging due to developmental changes. Gentamicin is hydrophilic and primarily eliminated by the kidneys, so maturation of the kidney causes changes in renal clearance, which directly affect drug exposure.

 

Clinically, the goal is to ensure sufficient exposure for efficacy while avoiding excessive levels that could lead to toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Despite consensus on once-daily dosing, there remains variation in guidelines, especially for neonates and young infants. The question addressed by this study was whether the current Dutch Paediatric Formulary (DPF) dosing recommendations achieve efficacy targets while minimizing toxicity risk in term neonates and infants.

 

 

The role of PBPK modelling in supporting clinical decision-making

 

PBPK modelling was used in this study to simulate current DPF gentamicin dosing regimens. This allowed the prediction of plasma concentrations across neonatal and infant age groups and assessment whether the current recommendations met therapeutic targets for efficacy and safety. PBPK modelling also enabled the evaluation of alternative dosing regimens.

 

A key advantage of PBPK modelling is its ability to simulate physiological changes, enabling more precise and age-appropriate dosing strategy. Additionally, the study considered clinical readiness by evaluating model uncertainty, the practicality of proposed dosing regimens, and the overall benefit-risk ratio, ensuring the results are suitable for implementation in clinical settings.

 

 

Evaluation of paediatric dosing

 

Simulations of the current DPF dosing regimen for neonates revealed that, while the peak concentrations generally fell within the desired therapeutic range, trough concentrations were often elevated, exceeding the safety threshold. This raised concerns about potential toxicity. Decreasing the dose was not considered appropriate, so extending the dosing interval was proposed, allowing for better drug clearance between doses.

 

For infants, the current dosing regimen was adequate for maintaining therapeutic levels, although for older infants (6–12 months), the Cmax tended to be on the low end of the efficacy range. A slight increase in the dose was suggested to optimize peak levels without compromising safety. Overall, the benefit–risk balance of the optimized regimens was considered positive and suitable for clinical implementation.

 

PBPK modelling added clear value by quantitatively balancing efficacy and toxicity targets across rapidly changing developmental stages, enabling physiologically grounded, age-specific dosing recommendations.

 

The full paper can be accessed here.